Il Consiglio europeo ha stabilito dopo il vertice di oggi a Bruxelles che Gheddafi “deve abbandonare il potere immediatamente”. La storia insegna che la tempistica, per lo più dettata on several factors, is never on the side of political leaders. Otherwise, it would explain the hesitation before the beginning of tyranny 900, nor even those against the Libyan Colonel and even dictators around the world. The "democratic transition" as evoked by the Western democracies emerge only during crises: in Tunisia, Egypt and now in Libya. After weeks of fighting guerrillas and are (finally) the freezing of Libyan assets in the old continent and twenty-seven formal notice to Gaddafi to step aside as soon as possible. I do not know why, but the scenario I am reminded of this article of Francis on T-Mag .
The crisis communication has the task of transmitting lucidity in the face of chaos, and communicate a rational reaction: "recognize" a crisis is the first major step to overcome it. But as we said this is only the theory and history shows how difficult it is to put into practice the principle. The facts are quite different and they say that crises are dealt with more generally in the worst way. The panic and immobility are king, and Murphy's Law with its postulates has too often good game. The typical example is that of diplomatic crises and the resulting conflicts is the exact moment of crisis, good communication should be of concern to deny Hiram Johnson, the same as in 1917, right in the conflict, said: "When war breaks out, the first casualty is truth."
0 comments:
Post a Comment